BOOKS & SPECIAL JOURNAL ISSUES


1.  Bush, S.S., & Drexler, M.L. (Eds.) (2002).  Ethical Issues in Clinical Neuropsychology, Lisse, NL:  Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.

 

 

 

 

2.  Hanson, S.L., Kerkhoff, T.R., & Bush, S.S. (2005). Health Care Ethics for Psychologists:  A Casebook.  Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

 

 

 

 

3.  Bush, S.S. (Ed.) (2005).  A Casebook of Ethical Challenges in Neuropsychology. New York:  Psychology Press.

 

 

 

 

4.  Bush, S.S. (guest editor) (2005). Ethical issues in forensic neuropsychology. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4 (3), special issue.

 

 

 

5.  Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (Eds.) (2005).  Geriatric Neuropsychology:  Practice Essentials.  New York:  Psychology Press.

 

 

 

6.  Bush, S.S., Connell, M.A., & Denney, R.L. (2006). Ethical Practice in Forensic Psychology:  A Systematic Model for Decision-Making.  Washington, D.C.:  American Psychological Association.

 

 

 

 

7.  Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (guest editors) (2006).  Special Issue:  Ethical controversies in neuropsychology.  Applied Neuropsychology, 13 (2).

 

 

 

8.  Bush, S.S. (2007). Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology. New York:  Oxford University Press.

 

 9.  Martin, T.A., & Bush, S.S. (guest editors) (2008). Special Issue:  Geriatric Neuropsychology. NeuroRehabilitation, 23 (5).

10.  Bush, S.S. (2009). Geriatric Mental Health Ethics:  A Casebook. New York:  Springer Publishing Company.

 

 

 

BOOK CHAPTERS

1.         Deidan, C., & Bush, S. (2002). Addressing perceived ethical violations by colleagues.  In S.S. Bush & M.L. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Clinical Neuropsychology (pp. 281 305). Lisse, NL:  Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.

 

2.         Wilde, E., Bush, S., & Zeifert, P. (2002).  Ethical issues in neuropsychology in

medical settings. In S.S. Bush & M.L. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Clinical

Neuropsychology (pp. 195-221). Lisse, NL:  Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.

 

3.         Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (2005). Ethical issues in geriatric neuropsychology. In

S.S. Bush & T.A. Martin (Eds.), Geriatric Neuropsychology:  Practice Essentials

(pp. 507-536). New York:  Psychology Press.

 

4.         Martelli, M.F., Zasler, N.D., Bush, S.S., & Pickett, T.C. (2006). Assessment of

response bias in impairment and disability examinations. In J. Leon-Carrion,

K.R.H. von Wild, & G.A. Zitnay (Eds.), Brain Injury Treatment:  Theories and

Practices (pp. 354-384). New York:  Taylor & Francis.

 

5.         Ameis, A., Zasler, N.D., Martelli, M.F., & Bush, S.S. (2006). Ethical issues in

clinicolegal practice. In N.D. Zasler, D. Katz, & R. Zafonte (Eds.), Brain Injury

Medicine: Principles and Practice (pp. 1163-1182).  New York:  Demos Medical Publishing.

 

6.         Martin, T.A., & Bush, S.S. (2008). Assessment tools and research methods

for human information processing speed.  In J. DeLuca & J.H. Kalmar (Eds.),

Information processing speed in clinical populations (pp. 29-51).  New York: 

Taylor & Francis.

 

7.         Rapp, D.L. Ferber, P.S., & Bush, S.S. (2008). Unresolved issues about

release of test data and test materials. In A.M. Horton, Jr. & D. Wedding (Eds.), The Neuropsychology Handbook, 3^rd Edition (pp. 471-500). New York:  Springer Publishing Co.

 

8.         Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (2008). Confidentiality in neuropsychological

practice. In A.M. Horton, Jr. & D. Wedding (Eds.), The Neuropsychology

Handbook, 3^rd Edition (pp. 517-532). New York:  Springer Publishing Co.

 

9.         Bush, S.S. (2008). Electrical brain injury:  A case of examiner shock. In R.L.

Heilbronner (Ed.), Neuropsychology in the Courtroom:  Expert Analysis of Reports and Testimony (pp. 79-94). New York:  Guilford Press.

 

10.       Bush, S.S. (2009). What to do after making the determination of malingering.

In J.E. Morgan & J.J. Sweet (Eds.), Neuropsychology of Malingering Casebook (pp. 530-539). New York: Taylor & Francis (Psychology Press).

 

11.       Bush, S.S. (2009). Symptom validity assessment practices:  Ethical and professional considerations (Die praxis der beschwerdenvalidierung: Ethische und fachwissenschaftliche gesichtspunkte). In T. Merten & H. Dettenborn (Eds.), Assessment of Malingering (Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvaliditat) (pp. 79-100). Berlin, Germany:  Deutscher Psychologen Verlag.

 

12.       Bush, S.S. (2010). Legal and ethical considerations in rehabilitation and

health assessment. In E. Mpofu & T. Oakland (Eds.), Assessment in

Rehabilitation and Health (pp. 22-36). Upper Saddle River, NJ:  Merrill (Pearson

Education Inc.). (published 3/09)

 

13.       Bush, S.S., & Myers, T. (in press). Pick’s disease. In J.E. Morgan, I.S. Baron,

& J.H. Ricker (Eds.), Casebook of Clinical Neuropsychology. New York:  Taylor

& Francis.

 

14.       Bush, S.S., & MacAllister, W.S. (in press). Ethical and legal guidelines for

pediatric neuropsychologists. In A.S. Davis (Ed.), Handbook of Pediatric Neuropsychology. New York:  Springer Publishing Co.

 

15.       Bush, S.S., Rapp, D.L., & Ferber, P.S. (in press). Maximizing test security in forensic neuropsychology. In A.M. Horton, Jr. & L.C. Hartlage (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2^nd Edition. New York:  Springer Publishing Co.

 

16.       Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (in press). Privacy, confidentiality, and privilege in forensic neuropsychology. In A.M. Horton, Jr. & L.C. Hartlage (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2^nd Edition. New York:  Springer Publishing Co.

 

17.       Bush, S.S., & Cuesta, G.M. (in press). Ethical issues in military neuropsychology.

In C.H. Kennedy & J. Moore (Eds.), Military Neuropsychology. New York:  Springer Publishing Co.

 

18.       Bush, S.S. (in press). Ethical considerations in the psychological evaluation and treatment of older adults. In S. Knapp (Ed.), Handbook of Ethics in Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

 

19.       Bush, S.S., & Iverson, G.L. (submitted). Ethical issues and practical considerations in sports neuropsychology. In F.M. Webbe (Ed.), Handbook of Sport Neuropsychology. New York: Spring Publishing Company.

 

 20.      Bush, S.S., MacAllister, W.S., & Goldberg, A. (submitted). Ethical issues in pediatric forensic neuropsychology. In E.M.S. Sherman & B.L. Brooks (Eds.), Pediatric Forensic Neuropsychology.  New York:  Oxford University  Press.

 

 ARTICLES

1.         Bush, S., & Bundick, T. (2000). Neuropsychological functioning and

neurorehabilitation of a young adult with Herpes Simplex Encephalitis. Bulletin of

the National Academy of Neuropsychology, 15 (1), 8-9.

 

2.         Bush, S. (2000). Intermanual differences in performing a visuoconstructional

task. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1151-1152.

 

3.         Bush, S. (2000). Intermanual visuoconstruction differences in rehabilitation patients. The Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 18 (6), 10-12.

 

4.         Bush, S., Naugle, R., & Johnson-Greene, D. (2002). The interface of information technology and neuropsychology:  Ethical issues and recommendations.  The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16 (4), 536-547.

 

5.         Martin, T., Bounds, T., Bush, S., Chwalisz, K., & Corrigan, J. (2002). Ten things

rehabilitation psychologists should know about the ticket to work program.

Rehabilitation Psychology News, 30 (1), 10-11.

 

6.         Bush, S., Goldberg, A., & Johnson-Greene, D. (2003). Rehabilitation psychology

ethics: Understanding and applying the 2002 APA Ethics Code. Rehabilitation

Psychology News, 30 (4), 13-15.

 

7.         Bush, S., & Macciocchi, S. (2003). The 2002 APA Ethics Code:  Select changes

relevant to neuropsychology. Bulletin of the National Academy of

Neuropsychology, 18 (2), 1-2 & 7-8.

 

8.         Martelli, M.F., Bush, S.S., & Zasler, N.D. (2003). Identifying, avoiding, and

addressing ethical misconduct in neuropsychological medicolegal practice. 

International Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1 (1), 26-44.

http://ijfp.psyc.uow.edu.au/.

 

9.         Bush, S., & Martin, T. (2004).  Intermanual differences on the Rey Complex

Figure Test.  Rehabilitation Psychology, 49 (1), 76-78.

 

10.       Bush, S.S., Ruff,  R.M., Tröster, A.I., Barth, J.T., Koffler, S.P., Pliskin, N.H.,

Reynolds, C.R., & Silver, C.H. (National Academy of Neuropsychology Policy &

Planning Committee) (2005). Symptom validity assessment:  Practice issues and

medical necessity.  Official position of the National Academy of

Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20 (4), 419-426.

 

German Translation by Thomas Merten, Ph.D.:

Bush, S.S., Ruff, A.M., Tröster, A.I., Barth, J.T., Koffler, S.P., Pliskin, N.H., Reynolds, C.R., & Silver, C.H. (2006). Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität: Praktische Gesichtspunkte und medizinische Erfordernisse. Neurologie & Rehabilitation, 12 (2), 69-74.

 

German translation reprinted (2007) in Praxis der Rechtpsychologie, 17 (1), 155-166.

 

11.       Bush, S.S., Barth, J.T., Pliskin, N.H., Arffa, S., Axelrod, B.N., Blackburn, L. A.,

Faust, D., Fisher, J.M., Harley, J.P., Heilbronner, R.L., Larrabee, G.J., Ricker,

J.H., & Silver, C.H. (National Academy of Neuropsychology Policy & Planning

Committee) (2005).  Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological

examinations:  Official statement of the National Academy of

Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20 (8), 997-1007.

Available online at http://www.nanonline.org/paio/IME.shtm, 10/03.

 

12.       Bush, S.S. (2005). Introduction to Ethical Issues in Forensic Neuropsychology.

Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4 (3), 1-9.

 

13.       Morgan, J.E., & Bush, S.S. (2005). Anticipating forensic involvement:  Ethical

considerations for clinical neuropsychologists. Journal of Forensic

Neuropsychology, 4 (3), 11-20.

 

14.       Bush, S.S., & Lees-Haley, P.R. (2005). Threats to the validity of forensic

neuropsychological data:  Ethical considerations.  Journal of Forensic

Neuropsychology, 4 (3), 45-66.

 

15.       Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (2006).  Introduction to ethical controversies in

neuropsychology. Applied Neuropsychology, 13 (2), 63-67.

 

16.       Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (2006).  The ethical and clinical practice of

disclosing raw test data:  Addressing the ongoing debate. Applied

Neuropsychology, 13 (2), 115-124.

 

17.       Bush, S.S. (2006). Neurocognitive enhancement:  Ethical issues for an

emerging subspecialty. Applied Neuropsychology, 13 (2), 125-136.

 

18.       Silver, C.H., Blackburn, L.B., Arffa, S., Barth, J.T., Bush, S.S., Koffler, S.P., Pliskin, N.H., Reynolds, C.R., Ruff, R.M., Tröster, A.I., Moser, R.S., & Elliott, R.W. (NAN Policy & Planning Committee) (2006). The importance of neuropsychological assessment for the evaluation of childhood learning disorders. Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 741-744.

 

19.       Puente, A.E., Adams, R., Barr, W.B., Bush, S.S., Ruff, R.M., Barth, J.T.,

Broshek, D., Koffler, S.P., Reynolds, C.R., Silver, C.H., & Tröster, A.I. (National Academy of Neuropsychology Policy & Planning Committee) (2006).  The use, education, training, and supervision of neuropsychological test technicians (psychometrists) in clinical practice. Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 837-839.

 

20.       Bush, S.S. (2007). Ethical implications for the assessment of symptom validity (Ethische Aspekte der Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität). Praxis der Rechtspsychologie, 17, 63-82.

 

21.       Moser, R.S., Iverson, G.L., Echemendia, R.J., Lovell, M.R., Schatz, P., Webbe, F.M., Ruff, R.M., Barth, J.T., Broshek, D.K, Bush, S.S., Koffler, S.P., Reynolds, C.R., & Silver, C.H. (2007). Neuropsychological evaluation in the diagnosis and management of sports-related concussion:  The position of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 909-916.

 

22.       Silver, C.H., Ruff, R.M., Iverson, G.L., Barth, J.T., Broshek, D.K, Bush, S.S., Koffler, S.P., & Reynolds, C.R. (NAN Policy & Planning Committee) (2008). Learning disabilities:  The need for neuropsychological evaluation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 217-219.

 

23.       Bush, S.S., Grote, C., Johnson-Greene, D., & Macartney-Filgate, M. (2008).

A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology. The Clinical

Neuropsychologist, 22, 321-344.

 

24.       Bush, S.S. (2008). Ethical cross-training in head trauma rehabilitation.

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 23, 181-184.

 

25.       Martin, T.A., & Bush, S.S. (2008). Introduction to special issue:  Geriatric

neuropsychology. NeuroRehabilitation. 23, 377-379.

 

26.       Martin, T.A., & Bush, S.S. (2008). Ethical considerations in geriatric

neuropsychology. NeuroRehabilitation. 23, 447-454.

 

27.       Bush, S.S., Pimental, P.A., Ruff, R.M., Iverson, G.L., Barth, J.T., & Broshek,

D.K. (2009). Secretive recording of neuropsychological testing and interviewing: Official position of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 1-2.

 

28.       Heilbronner, R.L., Bush, S.S., Ravdin, L.D., Barth, J.T., Iverson, G.L., Ruff,

R.M., Lovell, M.R., Barr, W.B., Echemendia, R.J., & Broshek, D.K. (2009). Neuropsychological consequences of boxing and recommendations to improve safety:  A National Academy of Neuropsychology educational paper   Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 11-19.

 

29.       Ruff, R.M., Iverson, G.L., Barth, J.T., Bush, S.S., & Broshek, D.K. (2009).

Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury:  A National Academy of Neuropsychology Education Paper. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 3-10.

 

30.       Judd, T., Capetillo, D., Carrion-Baralt, J., Marmol, L.M., San Miguel-Montes, L.,

Navarrete, M.G., Puente, A.E., Romero, H.R., Valdes, J., Ruff, R.M., Iverson, G.L., Barth, J.T., Broshek, D.K., Bush, S.S., Koffler, S.P., Reynolds, C.R., & Silver, C.H. (2009). Professional considerations for improving the neuropsychological evaluation of Hispanics:  A National Academy of Neuropsychology Education Paper. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 127-135.

 

31.       Heilbronner, R.L., Sweet, J.J., Morgan, J.E., Larrabee, G.J., Millis, S., and

Conference Participants (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093-1129.

 

32.       Sandberg, M.A., Bush, S.S., & Martin, T.A. (2009). Beyond Diagnosis:

Understanding the healthcare challenges of injured veterans through the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1416-1432.

 

33.       Bush, S.S. (2010). Determining whether or when to adopt new versions of

psychological and neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist,

24, 7-16.

 

34.       Meharg, S.S, & Bush, S.S. (in press). Notation of professional qualifications and

affiliations:  Avoiding puffery and deception. Applied Neuropsychology.

 

35.       Carone, D.A., Iverson, G.L., & Bush, S.S. (under revision). A three-phase model

to approaching and providing feedback to patients regarding invalid neuropsychological test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist.